| PATCH NAME | STATUS | STATUS DATE | SUMMARY | | SU38961.48-1805*04 | D | 09/25/08 | Clients reported a number of issues for the STRS and PERS retirement üprocesses. Please see the Description section for more information üabout the issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU39967.56-1805*05 | D | 09/24/08 | |
| SU37997.52-4.1.0*382 | D | 09/16/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with the software. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU38342.37-485*10 | D | 09/16/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with the software. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU39195.78-1805*05 | D | 09/16/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with the software. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU41132.56-1805*02 | I | 09/12/08 | After loading software update 31056.78, when a payment was reversed onüthe Cash Receipt Reversal (CRRE) form, problems with the way Colleagueüstored the information could cause subsequent inquiries or future üchanges to be incorrect.üüTechnical: The pointer from the original payment to the reversing üpayment was not updated. |
| SU41060.26-1805*01 | I | 09/05/08 | The WebAdvisor Requisition Status and Purchase Order Status web forms üwere re-released on the software update for AnswerNet activity ü28774.67. As part of that release, the paging functionality was üdisabled, limiting users to viewing only the 20 most recent documents.ü The Requisition Status and Purchase Order Status web forms needed a ümodification to allow users to view all available documents. Paging üshould still be disabled for these two web forms. |
| SU40141.59-1805*08 | I | 09/04/08 | Clients need to be able to easily report on memberships, member üdemographics, and membership renewal trends. |
| SU41027.63-1805*01 | I | 09/04/08 | If a student's program having exceptions or overrides was evaluated üfrom the Exceptions and Overrides (EXOV) form, incorrect results couldühave been returned. This happened when the EXOV form was used to run üthe Evaluate Student Program (EVAL) process, then the user changed üsomething on the EXOV form (so that that evaluation was no longer ücurrent) and re-evaluated that program from the EXOV form. The üevaluation might have applied incorrect courses, returning incorrect üevaluation results.üWhether or not this occurred depended on the number of exceptions or üoverrides and the number of times the evaluation was rerun from the üEXOV form, related to an internal matrix size of twenty. (The first üevaluation from the EXOV form was always correct. For a student with üonly two exceptions, the first ten evaluations from the EXOV form üwould have been correct, but the eleventh would have been incorrect. üFor a student with more than ten exceptions or more than ten üoverrides, the second evaluation would have been incorrect.) |
| SU6096.93-1805*03 | I | 09/03/08 | When the Batch Employee Wage Changes (BEWC) and the Review Batch Wage üChanges (RVWC) processes were completed, Colleague did not update the üPPWG.WORKLOAD.PCT field in the PERPOSWG records. This was causing a üproblem where you were not able to bring the new wage records into a üpayroll. You would receive an error stating that there were no wages üfor the employees when running the Pay Period Generation (PPGN) or theüPay Period Gross Summary (PPGS) processes. Other fields not being üupdated by the BEWC and RVWC processes in the PERPOSWG records were:ü" PPWG_HOLIDAY_WORK_TIME_AMTü" PPWG_HOLIDAY_WORK_TIME_UNITSüüColleague did not update the HRP.PERPOS.LAST.PAY.DATE field in the üHRPER record when you entered a last pay date on the BEWC form.üüAnswerNet Document 33906.11üOn the Person's Wage Summary (WAGS) form, when the end date and last üpay date of the most recent wage record were changed and a new wage ürecord was added before saving information on the WAGS form, Colleagueüdeleted the PPWG.PAYCLASS.ID and the PPWG.WORKLOAD.PCT of the wage ürecord being replaced. |
| SU38985.25-4.1.0*373 | I | 08/28/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with the IS Subroutine, Web, and üComputed Column generators. See the Description section for more üinformation about the issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU39528.15-485*05 | I | 08/28/08 | 33991.52 - The AR.SVAR array that is used by web forms and processes üwas dimensioned to be a size of 400. Some Datatel-delivered web formsüwere close to using all 400 slots of the array, and sometimes when a üclient customized the form, they ended up needing more than 400 slots.ü If the 400 slots were exceeded, a web form would fail with the error ümessage "The server was unable to process your request. This may be üdue to a cataloging problem. Please contact your system üadministrator."üü35392.96 - When new computed columns are created for file suite ütemplate files (such as GLA.FYR, TA.ACYR, etc.) on the Define ComputedüColumn (DCC) form, the strategies records for all file suite instancesüfor those templates (for example, GLA.2006, GLA.2007, TA.2006, üTA.2007, etc.) should be rebuilt. The rebuild is necessary to allow üeach of the file suite instances to become "aware" of the new computedücolumn. However, this was not occurring, and the only strategies ürecord being rebuilt was the file suite template. |
| SU39572.37-1805*06 | I | 08/28/08 | Clients requested enhancements to the Optional Retirement Program ü(ORP) reports in the Texas State Reporting - Human Resources (TXHR) üoptional module to assist them with completion of the Fiscal Year üReport of Annual ORP Participation reports required by the Texas üHigher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). |
| SU40603.89-485*01 | I | 08/28/08 | When an update to the DATATELX bundle was released by Datatel, the ürelease system failed to properly deploy it. |
| SU36104.75-1805*03 | I | 08/22/08 | If a pledge is posted to the General Ledger, it posts a credit to the üPledge Revenue GL Account and a debit to the Pledge Receivable Accountüas defined on the Designation Definition (DSD) form. When a payment üto the pledge was received and posted to the General Ledger, Colleagueüdebited the Pledge Revenue GL Account and credited the Pledge üReceivable Account, in addition to debiting Cash and crediting the üDonation Revenue Account.üThis was causing accounting issues on the General Ledger, especially üwhen the payment was in a different fiscal year than the pledge. |
| SU40031.26-1805*08 | I | 08/22/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were identified by üDatatel and clients for the Advancement conversion programs. For the üresolved change requests, see the Description section. For the üenhancements, see the Resolution section. |
| SU40198.44-1805*05 | I | 08/21/08 | Several change requests and enhancement opportunities were identified üby Datatel and clients. For the resolved change requests, see the üDescription section. For the additional enhancements, see the üResolution section. |
| SU40251.48-1805*04 | I | 08/21/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with registration functions in üColleague and WebAdvisor. See the Description section for more üinformation about the issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU34329.41-485*04 | D | 08/11/08 | |
| SU28774.67-1805*28 | I | 08/08/08 | Clients wanted to be able to receive goods and services through üWebAdvisor. They also wanted the ability to request a payment for üthemselves or for a vendor through WebAdvisor.üüClients also reported a number of issues with receiving functionality üin Colleague Finance. See the Description section for an overview of üthe activities resolved with this release. |
| SU40209.44-485*02 | D | 08/08/08 | The Section 508 compliant accessibility stylesheets had an issue that ücaused some forms with more than one table to render incorrectly.üüClients wanted to be able to produce US and Canadian end-of-year üregulatory documents in PDF format. |
| SU40493.59-1805*04 | I | 08/07/08 | The Bookstore Reverse Sales Tax (BKRT) process correctly created üadjusting invoices to reverse sales tax on certain Bookstore invoices,übut the adjusting invoices did not have all of their fields populated.ü Also, some of the adjusted invoices may have had duplicate pointers üto their adjusting invoice items. |
| SU37941.19-1805*02 | I | 08/05/08 | The Leave Request Online (LRO) optional module did not function if theüinstitution did not also license the Employment Actions (EA) optional ümodule. The following LRO processes failed to run if the EA optional ümodule was not licensed:ü- Employment Actions Parameters (EAPS) - Employment Actions Types ü(PEAT)ü- Process Employment Actions (PPEA) - Select Open Employment Actions ü(SOEA) - Employment Actions History (PEAH) - Leave Request (WPLE)ü- Leave - Paid and Unpaid (PELE)ü- Open Employment Actions (POEA) |
| SU37307.37-1805*07 | I | 07/31/08 | The National Student Clearinghouse has been researching and consultingüwith registrars around the country in an effort to identify additionalüdata elements that registrars want to include in Clearinghouse üservices.üThe resulting list of expanded data elements will support a variety ofüservices, such as enhanced institutional research, improved student üidentification and record matching, student discount programs, and ünational research initiatives.üüClients need to be able to have two data reporting options to the üNational Student Clearinghouse. The first option is to report the üoriginal data elements without the new data elements. The second üoption is to report original data elements with the voluntary data üelements. |
| SU36790.96-4.1.0*350 | I | 07/30/08 | Updates were required to DMI to support Single Sign-On between the üActiveCampus Portal and BlackBoard. |
| SU36933.19-485*09 | I | 07/30/08 | This UT/Tool software update addresses the following issues. For a ücomplete list of issues resolved with Version 1.5 of the Portal, see üthe "Release Highlights: ActiveCampus Portal 1.5," available from the üDocumentation area of the Datatel website ü(www.datatel.com/documentation).üüUpdates were required for Colleague to improve support of the üActiveCampus Portal optional module and its integration with the thirdüparty product Blackboard.üüSome support situations would have been improved by the availability üof a batch process to change the status of a large number of üworkflows.üüSee the Description section for more information about the problems üresolved with this software update. |
| SU36934.15-1805*11 | I | 07/30/08 | This Core/ST software update addresses the following issues. For a ücomplete list of issues resolved with Version 1.5 of the Portal, see üthe "Release Highlights: ActiveCampus Portal 1.5," available from the üDocumentation area of the Datatel website ü(www.datatel.com/documentation).üüUpdates were required for Colleague Core and Colleague Student to üsupport the ActiveCampus Portal interface to the Blackboard course üsoftware system.üüIn addition, it was too easy for clients to accidentally create class üteam sites for all classes when using the Create Portal Class Site ü(CPCS) form. |
| SU39895.37-1805*03 | I | 07/30/08 | Clients reported several issues with Colleague Finance Fixed Assets ümodule. See the Description section for an overview of the activities üresolved with this release. |
| SU40285.59-1805*02 | I | 07/30/08 | Although the Council for Aid to Education did not issue changes to theüVoluntary Support of Education (VSE) reports for 2008, several üenhancement opportunities were identified by Datatel and clients. |
| FRX-clive18*01 | I | 07/27/08 | ********** From release package: SU22579.67-1805*04 **********ýClients reported a number of issues with Colleague's Financial üReporting Export. See the Description section for an overview of the üactivities resolved with this release. ýý********** From release package: SU29768.19-1805*04 **********ýClients experienced degraded performance from various subroutines and übatch processes due to an inefficiency in the process initialization ücode.ýý********** From release package: SU24889.81-1805*07 **********ýThe CF Data Export to FRx (FRXE) process was counting the opening übalance transactions twice. This was happening as the FRXE process wasüincorrectly adding the detail transactions for the source codes "AA - üActual Open Balance" and "AE - Encumbrance Open Balance" to the üexported opening balance. No detail transactions for these source ücodes need to be added. The opening balances are already included in üthe calculation of fiscal period balances when calculating the amountsüfor period 0. (In FRx, period 0 represents opening balances). |
| FRX-testnew*01 | D | 07/25/08 | ********** From release package: SU22579.67-1805*04 **********ýClients reported a number of issues with Colleague's Financial üReporting Export. See the Description section for an overview of the üactivities resolved with this release. ýý********** From release package: SU29768.19-1805*04 **********ýClients experienced degraded performance from various subroutines and übatch processes due to an inefficiency in the process initialization ücode.ýý********** From release package: SU24889.81-1805*07 **********ýThe CF Data Export to FRx (FRXE) process was counting the opening übalance transactions twice. This was happening as the FRXE process wasüincorrectly adding the detail transactions for the source codes "AA - üActual Open Balance" and "AE - Encumbrance Open Balance" to the üexported opening balance. No detail transactions for these source ücodes need to be added. The opening balances are already included in üthe calculation of fiscal period balances when calculating the amountsüfor period 0. (In FRx, period 0 represents opening balances). |
| SU39136.26-1805*03 | I | 07/25/08 | Clients reported several issues and enhancement requests for the TexasüState Reporting - Human Resources (TXHR) optional module. See the üDescription section for a list of the change requests resolved in thisüupdate. |
| SU39175.96-485*07 | I | 07/24/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with Envision Runtime processing üand the Envision Tool Kit. See the Description section for more üinformation about the problems resolved with this software update. |
| SU40066.59-1805*01 | I | 07/22/08 | This software update resolves the following issues related to the üSU38766.59-1805*04 software update, which provided enhancements to theüFinancial Aid Transmittal Register (FATR) process:üü39997.33 - TA.XMIT.FLAG improperly set to Y After 38766.59 After üinstalling SU38766.59-1805*04, some clients reported that under ücertain circumstances the FATR process would mark an award as "fully ütransmitted," even though untransmitted funds remained.üü39517.75 - FATR - ARB010 Uninitialized Variable Zero Assumed After üinstalling 38766.59, some clients encountered an error message when ürunning the FATR process. The error reported that a variable had not übeen initialized before use. |
| SU40342.93-1805*03 | I | 07/22/08 | Software update SU40066.59-1805*01 corrected an error in the FinancialüAid Transmittal Register (FATR) process, in which some awards were üimproperly marked as "fully transmitted." However, SU40066.59-1805*01üdid not correct the awards that had already been improperly marked. |
| SU39312.67-1805*06 | I | 07/15/08 | A number of issues were identified by clients for resolution within üColleague Advancement. Please see the Description section for more üinformation. |
| SU34150.59-1805*08 | I | 07/10/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with the General Ledger üInstallation (GLIN), Authorize Next GL File Suite (AGLS), and GL üComponent Update (GLDU) processes in Colleague Finance. See the üDescription section for an overview of the activities resolved with üthis release for more detailed information. |
| SU39185.26-1805*07 | I | 07/10/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were identified by üDatatel and clients for the Advancement conversion programs. For the üresolved change requests, see the release summary Description. For üthe enhancements, see the Resolution section. |
| SU37554.93-1805*09 | I | 07/09/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with the List GL Activity (LGLA) üand the Condense GL Activity (CGLA) processes in Colleague Finance. üSee the Description section for an overview of the activities resolvedüwith this release. |
| SU37868.52-1805*03 | I | 07/09/08 | Clients had difficulty deploying and managing customizations of the üDatatel released Reporting Views. The views were not available for üOracle environments. Clients requested a number of enhancements and üfixes for SQL Server environments -- see the Description section for ümore information about the issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU37868.52-1805*05 | I | 07/09/08 | Clients had difficulty deploying and managing customizations of the üDatatel released Reporting Views. The views were not available for üOracle environments. Clients requested a number of enhancements and üfixes for SQL Server environments -- see the Description section for ümore information about the issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU39920.85-485*02 | I | 07/03/08 | 39839.67 - If two EDX.TX records got created at the exact same ümillisecond, then the first EDX.TX record was incorrectly overwritten üby the second EDX.TX record. This occurred because both EDX.TX ürecords were assigned the exact same key.üü39648.75 - When an EDX.TX record was created, there was no particular üorder in which the elements processed in the EDX.TX record appear in üfield 6. Some institutions interface with a third-party system that üexpects the order of attributes in field 6 of the EDX.TX record to be üin a certain order.üü39953.15 - In some rare scenarios, Envision corrupted records in an üapplication server file, overwriting valid data with an 8 digit ünumber. |
| SU39969.52-1805*01 | I | 07/03/08 | This software update resolves the following issues related to Instant üEnrollment, which were introduced with the following software updates.ü If you installed these updates, Datatel highly recommends that you üinstall this update promptlyü*********************************üRP 746 - SU38476.37-4.1.0*351üRP 1832 - SU31057.63-1805*14üRP 2188 - SU38032.19-485*02üRP 1831 - SU31056.78-1805*22ü*********************************üü39645.85 - WINR: Instant Enrollment causing Incomplete Prior Billing üWhen a class had multiple AR codes, Instant Enrollment did not bill üthe class correctly, causing an 'Incomplete prior billing' message to üappear. |
| SU32616.74-1805*24 | I | 06/30/08 | Numerous issues provided difficulties for clients. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU32996.44-1805*36 | I | 06/30/08 | Clients with membership programs were unable to track their ümemberships and associated dues in Advancement. Additionally, severalüenhancement opportunities were identified for the profile reports. |
| SU36638.63-1805*20 | I | 06/30/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel development and quality assurance teams and beta clients for üRetention Alert. See the Description section for more information üabout the changes included in this software update. |
| SU39615.59-485*02 | I | 06/30/08 | In the course of volume testing, the Datatel quality assurance team ünoted lackluster performance on the My To Do List form if there were aülarge number of tasks to display.üüA separate issue occurred in defining WfMS workflow hook code. If a üuser detailed from the WF Activity Definition (WADF) form to the WF üActivity Hook Code (WAHC) form, then detailed on Hook Code Statements übut then canceled out from each form, all but the first line of hook ücode was duplicated. (For example, 10 lines of code would become 19 ülines of code). |
| SU39797.89-1805*02 | I | 06/30/08 | Due to the size of the first Membership Update delivered on software üupdate 32996.44, Datatel identified a number of items that needed to übe delivered on a second software update. |
| SU40000.67-1805*02 | I | 06/30/08 | 39914.15üThe Contact (S8) conversion did not update the STAFF file with a üpointer in the STAFF.CONTACT.LIST field. As a result, converted ücontacts were not displayed on the Staff Activity (SARP) report in üColleague Advancement.üü39915.81üThe Research (S3) conversion was not converting the üBCA.PROSPECT.MISC.INFO and BCA.PROSPECT.HISTORY fields from the üBENCA.RESEARCH file unless the BCA.PROSPECT.COMMENTS field was also üpopulated. |
| SU36486.25-1805*07 | I | 06/27/08 | A new type of grant, the TEACH grant, was introduced by the Departmentüof Education, and the new PESC 3.0a XML schema was introduced for ütransferring records. Colleague needed to be updated to support the ünew grant and schema. (The schema is supported for Non-TEACH awards.) |
| SU37649.04-485*16 | I | 06/27/08 | In addition to new features delivered with UI Web 3.0, clients üreported several issues for the UI Web and UI Desktop 2.x. See the üDescription section for more information about the problems resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU39172.37-1805*05 | I | 06/27/08 | In addition to new features delivered with UI Web 3.0, clients üreported several issues for the UI Web and UI Desktop 2.x. See the üDescription section for more information about the problems resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU39313.11-4.1.0*361 | I | 06/27/08 | The Post-Secondary Education Committee (PESC) has been instrumental inüchanging the format of the XML documents used in COD processing. üSeveral new style sheets needed to be created to transform the üoutgoing XML documents into the new 3.0a level format. |
| SU36817.85-1805*11 | I | 06/26/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with Colleague Finance. See the üDescription section for an overview of the activities resolved with üthis release, and see "Release Highlights: CF Summer Bundle 2008," üavailable for download from Datatel's website ü(www.datatel.com/documentation), for more detailed information. |
| SU39929.48-485*01 | I | 06/26/08 | Various products required additional COMMON variables, but would ürequire loading the product that shipped the changes. This software üupdate provides the required COMMON variables without introducing üdependency issues. |
| SU39167.85-1805*04 | I | 06/25/08 | Due to the changes from the Ensuring Continued Access to Student LoansüAct of 2008 (ECASLA) which was signed into law on May 7, 2008, updatesüto allow for the increases in the Annual and Aggregate Stafford Loan üLimits needed to be modified for award packaging. |
| SU38736.15-1805*04 | I | 06/24/08 | Clients wanted a way to track compensatory time using Colleague. |
| SU38464.19-1805*07 | I | 06/23/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with specific forms in Colleague üHR.üSee the Description section for more information about the issues üresolved with this software update. |
| SU38670.52-1805*01 | I | 06/20/08 | 30115.59 - In the confirmation e-mail generated by the Instant üEnrollment process, the process did not include a listing of the ücourse sections enrolled in if there were no charges associated with üthe course registration.üü9276.22 - If a user had more than one e-mail address in Colleague, theüInstant Enrollment process would try to match that single address üentered on WINR against the list of addresses and incorrectly asses a üpenalty when executing the duplicate checking in the WINR process. |
| SU38208.37-485*10 | I | 06/19/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with the software. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU39183.56-1805*01 | I | 06/19/08 | Benefactor's Affiliation functionality was used over the years by üclients to record several different types of information. The initialüdelivery of conversion programs allowed clients to convert affiliationüinformation as a person to organization relationship or as a person üachievement. Clients could additionally choose to not convert an üaffiliation from Benefactor.üHowever, The Ben to Advancement Conversions did not provide sufficientüoptions for other common usages of Benefactor's Affiliation üfunctionality. |
| SU36521.19-1805*01 | I | 06/18/08 | 3798.26 - GL distribution rule does not look at original invoice when ücreating adjustmentüSome clients have requested better access to the GL distribution of ücharges incurred by student course sections. Because a registration üinvoice item did not keep track of the course section that created it,üsubsequent adjustments and reversals caused that association to be ülost.üü37530.63 - Changes necessary for ODS to report course revenue ücorrectly Because a registration invoice item did not keep track of üthe course section that created it, it was difficult to determine the ürevenue associated with a course offering. |
| SU39617.37-1805*01 | I | 06/17/08 | Batch processes running against a saved list, and updating the PERSON,üADDRESS, PERSON.PIN, or HRPER files, could terminate before all ürecords were processed if the EDX LDAP Subscriber Interface was üloaded. |
| SU36813.41-485*04 | I | 06/13/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with the software. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU39382.74-1805*02 | I | 06/13/08 | 38771.48 Clients occasionally reported that taxes amounts were not üproperly rounded on the Bookstore Reverse Taxes (BKRT) form.üü39380.78 The Sponsored Student Billing Rpt (SSRP) process incorrectly ülisted taxes that had been reversed on the BKRT form. The SSRP üprocess listed those taxes twice. |
| SU39639.26-1805*01 | I | 06/11/08 | 39638.52üThe Automatic Payment (AUTO) process returned an error and logged the üuser out of Colleague if the Create Correspondence field was set to ü"Yes" when processing automatic payments that were classified as üCredit Cards, E-Checks, or Other. |
| SU39274.81-485*04 | I | 06/10/08 | WebAdvisor 3.1.2 delivered logic to tighten up the creation of URLs übased on Envision hyperlink definitions. This new logic failed for üPortal links to team sites. |
| SU29325.89-1805*07 | I | 06/06/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with Colleague Finance. See the üDescription section for an overview of the activities resolved with üthis release. Also see Release Highlights: Re-Approvals, available forüdownload from the Datatel website (www.datatel.com/documentation), forümore detailed information. |
| SU38750.41-1805*04 | I | 06/06/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for Colleague's Contacts and Reminders üfunctionality. For example, clients wanted to be able to record ücontact records for multiple individuals simultaneously. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU38804.48-1805*07 | I | 06/06/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for Colleague Advancement. See the Description üsection for more information about the issues resolved with this üsoftware update. |
| SU39345.07-1805*01 | I | 06/05/08 | The Pay Period Generation (PPGN) process produced inconsistent resultsüon the Payroll Exception Report from one run to the next. The PAYPRDSürecords were being deleted in some cases where the person should have übeen processed through payroll normally.üüArrears were not always being processed when time was unapproved, and üarrears did not take precedence over unapproved time. |
| SU38749.82-1805*06 | I | 06/04/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for Colleague's Saved List utilities. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU39576.11-1805*01 | I | 06/04/08 | Disabled students who were enrolled in courses that were not üdesignated for disabled students were reported with zero primary üdisability services contacts on the Student Disabilities (SD) report üeven though they had valid contacts entered into Colleague. |
| SU39480.44-485*01 | I | 06/03/08 | With the release of WebAdvisor 3.1.2, some users were seeing links on üthe Web My To Do List form pop up new windows. This prevented the üuser from using the BACK button to return to the Web My To Do List. |
| SU39489.74-1805*01 | I | 06/03/08 | The Manage Person Relations (REL) workflow in Colleague CORE was not üproperly directing users to the Spouse Address (SPOA) or Family üDefinition (FAMD) forms. |
| SU39045.52-4.1.0*356 | I | 05/30/08 | There are two issues resolved by this DAS update:üü38846.04 - Users were sometimes disconnected from UI with the error ümessage "UniFile Exception 81009 The RPC Failed." Although this is a ügeneric error message received from UniData, there was one specific üscenario in the DAS that could cause this error message to occur when üperforming UniData locking reads.üTechnical: There was a timeout related issue with UniData DAS reads, üspecifically those with locks. Under heavy load or with just the üright timing, this could cause a session disconnect with an RPC error.ü The error is quite random, with no real pattern, and there is no üworkaround other than to log in and try again.üüClients could not operate instances of both Oracle 10g and Oracle 11g üon the same server at the same time, preventing them from testing an üOracle 11g environment while still running an Oracle 10g environment.üTechnical: In order to support a client's need to install instances ofüOracle 10g and Oracle 11g on the same server, it became necessary for üthe DAS to set the ORACLE_HOME environment variable before executing üthe loadjava command to deploy computed columns to the Oracle üdatabase.üFurthermore, if Oracle 10g and 11g are on the same server, there are ütwo versions of loadjava on the same server so the DAS needs the üORACLE_HOME path to ensure that it executes the right version of üloadjava since the script did change between Oracle 10g and Oracle ü11g. |
| SU39177.26-485*04 | I | 05/30/08 | Clients could not run instances of Oracle 10g and Oracle 11g on the üsame server, preventing them from being able to run an Oracle 11g testüenvironment while still running an Oracle 10g live environment on the üsame server.üüTechnical:üIn order to support a client's need to install instances of Oracle 10güand Oracle 11g on the same server, it became necessary to store the üORACLE_HOME path in the database for each environment. This will üallow the computed column generator to conditionally set the üORACLE_HOME path and use the correct version of loadjava when üdeploying computed columns to an Oracle database. |
| SU38637.93-485*08 | I | 05/29/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with Envision Runtime processing üand the Envision Tool Kit. See the Description section for more üinformation about the problems resolved with this software update. |
| SU38740.33-1805*05 | I | 05/28/08 | Several defects and enhancement opportunities have been reported in üvarious conversions. |
| SU39142.82-1805*02 | I | 05/27/08 | In Release 17 the subroutine S.GET.TRGR.STAC was used to retrieve ücredits for a specified transcript grouping. The results were used toüdetermine cumulative credits and GPA for use in queries and reports. üThis subroutine was no longer available for this purpose in Release ü18.üAdditionally there were errors in the comments in the header of the üsubroutine. |
| SU39112.52-1805*03 | I | 05/23/08 | Several import issues needed to be addressed:ü -New Race/Ethnicity fields were needed in the PERSON file for üfuture IPEDS reporting, and Colleague needed the ability to accept üdata for these fields through the INTER.BIODEMO import.ü -There was no way to update the end date for an address imported üthrough the INTER.BIODEMO import.ü -If person mail rules and address mail rules were being imported, aüclient's defined validation code values could overflow the üINTER.BIODEMO fields.ü -The INTER.OTHER.ADDRESS import did not update the PERSON file whenüpersonal phones were imported.ü -The INTER.OTHER.ADDRESS import did not handle a preferred mail üindicator. |
| SU39444.37-1805*01 | I | 05/23/08 | Some processes that import addresses -- in particular the ISIR Import ü(ISIM) process -- would issue a large number of prompts as they üimported a large number of addresses.üüTechnical:üA recent software update (SU36903.85-1805*09) modified the address üprocessing logic for a specific scenario: when householding applies, aünew address is entered for a person that matches an existing address üalready on file for the same person, and the existing address is üselected by the householding resolution process. The software update üchanged Colleague to stop the update in this scenario, and issue the üuser a message. The user was expected to edit the existing address üinstead, because otherwise some address data would be lost if it was ünot identical between the new and existing records. However the üaddress processing code was instructed to suppress messages and üprompts when processed by batch processes and Web Advisor forms. In üthe case of WebAdvisor forms, the address update would be skipped üafter SU36903.85-1805*09, but there would be no message to the user. üIn the case of foreground batch processes, a large number of ücumbersome messages requiring a user response would be presented.üBackground batch processes could function incorrectly as well. |
| SU39501.74-1805*01 | I | 05/23/08 | The utility created to copy the single-valued earnings type on the üLeave Plan Definition (LEAD) form to the new multi-valued field was ünot being called by the automatic post-install utilities with the üsoftware update for SU25776.59-1805*30. |
| SU38751.63-1805*06 | I | 05/22/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for Colleague's Core functionality. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU25776.59-1805*30 | I | 05/20/08 | Clients requested the following enhancements for the WebAdvisor Time üEntry and Approval optional module:ü- Withhold pay during a normal payroll cycle for employees with üunapproved time entries.ü-Specify cutoff dates and times for each pay cycle. (12510.19) - Allowünon-employee supervisors to modify, approve, and reject time entries. ü(13244.44)ü- Allow alternate supervisors to be assigned at the position level.ü(11995.04)ü-Exclude leave plans and balances from being displayed on the Time üEntry and Approval forms. (14741.78)üüClients also requested a way to enter leave without pay. (9798.93)üüIn addition, a number of AnswerNet issues were resolved with this üupdate. |
| SU38648.74-1805*01 | I | 05/20/08 | After loading the Colleague Finance Spring Bundle, 30570.52, the üsummary page on the Voucher Register (VREG) report and the Voucher üPurge Register (VPRG) report did not display the GL account number ücorrectly. |
| SU38849.63-485*01 | I | 05/20/08 | In R18, the Reset My Password process did not mark a user's password üas expired after it was reset. |
| SU38176.44-1805*08 | I | 05/16/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for Colleague's organization functionality. See üthe Description section for more information about the issues resolvedüwith this software update. |
| SU38515.37-1805*03 | I | 05/15/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for Colleague's Communications Management üfunctionality. See the Description section for more information about üthe issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU30680.15-485*18 | I | 05/09/08 | In addition to new features delivered with WebAdvisor 3.1.2, clients üreported several issues for the WebAdvisor 3.x release. See the üDescription section for more information about the problems resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU37078.52-1805*02 | I | 05/09/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with Colleague Finance and Human üResources. See the Description section for an overview of the üactivities resolved with this release for more detailed information. |
| SU37693.07-485*04 | I | 05/09/08 | It was found that the Deploy SQL View Scripts (DSVS) form would stop üresponding when deploying the CF-GL_VIEWS in a SQL Server environment.üüUsers wanted the ability to use the @ LookUp on the Edit SQL View üScripts (ESVS) form.üüWhen trying to save a large SQL View script (such as CF-GL_VIEWS), theüESVS form would refuse to save the record if either of the view ücreation scripts exceeded 32,500 characters.üüIn SQL Server, the Multipart key views performed slower than they had üto due to the use of a user-defined function (dbo.FIELD) instead of ünative functions. Queries against the views would also stop respondingüwhen they encountered record locks, which are inevitable in a üproduction Colleague database.üüClients with custom privileges on their SQL Server views would lose ütheir security setups each time a Multipart key view was redeployed. |
| SU35940.44-1805*01 | I | 05/08/08 | The Build Stu Basics (SB) Data (CASB) process stopped responding when üdoing the selection for Voc Ed students. |
| SU38766.59-1805*04 | I | 05/08/08 | This software update resolves the following issues related to the üSU37690.56-1805*03 software update, which provided enhancements to theüFinancial Aid Transmittal Register (FATR) process:üü38643.44 - AR:Problem running FATR/FATP (Issue #1) Some clients had anüissue with the FATR process when running it in non-update mode. If a üstudent had multiple awards and one of the awards failed rule üevaluation, then none of the student's awards were sent to the Batch üFA Transmittal Update (FATP) process. Clients have requested that a üstudent's valid awards be sent to the FATP process, even if some of üthe student's awards fail rule evaluation.üü210.1100 - FA/AR: TA.XMIT.FLAG is incorrectly maintained 38643.44 - üAR:Problem running FATR/FATP (Issue #2) Some clients reported that it üwas possible for the FATR process to mark an award as fully ütransmitted, even if the award failed eligibility rules or still had üuntransmitted funds. |
| SU31056.78-1805*25 | I | 05/05/08 | Students could not view information about their payment plans, and ümake payments on those plans, over the web. Institutions could not ügenerate late charges on payment plans as soon as they were late. üSome clients needed the ability for web payments to be posted to üdifferent GL accounts based on various factors. Payment plan paymentsüwere overpaying charges that were paid by some other kind of payment ü(typically Sponsor Billing or Financial Aid). |
| SU31057.63-1805*14 | I | 05/05/08 | Database changes were needed to support the Web Payment Enhancements üproject. |
| SU38032.19-485*02 | I | 05/05/08 | The payment confirmation form in WebAdvisor included language that wasüspecific to VeriSign, which needed to reference PayPal instead. üColleague also needed to produce e-mail messages in a format similar üto a WebAdvisor form. |
| SU38476.37-4.1.0*351 | I | 05/05/08 | Colleague needed to produce e-mail messages in a format similar to a üWebAdvisor form. |
| SU35965.37-1805*07 | I | 04/30/08 | Clients reported several issues and enhancement requests for the üGraduation (CBM009) Report and Marketable Skills Achievement (CBM00M) üReport programs in the Texas State Reporting - Student (TXST) optionalümodule. See the Description section for a list of the change requestsüresolved in this update. |
| SU36662.85-1805*09 | I | 04/30/08 | Regulatory updates were needed in Colleague to be able to process COD üinformation for 2008/2009. Clients reported a number of issues with üthe software. See the Description section for more information about üthe issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU36906.75-1805*05 | I | 04/30/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for Colleague's relationship functionality. See üthe Description section for more information about the issues resolvedüwith this software update. |
| SU37492.74-4.1.0*345 | I | 04/30/08 | Several edits have been introduced by the Department of Education thatürelate to unsubsidized funding and require a modification to the üstyle-sheets used in the exporting of information to COD. |
| SU38683.74-4.1.0*349 | I | 04/29/08 | The ojdbc jar file for Oracle database connectivity is named üdifferently for Oracle 11g. The jar file had been named ojdbc14.jar üfor Oracle 10g but is now named ojdbc5.jar for Oracle 11g. The üdmilistener.jar neededs to be updated to include ojdbc5.jar on its üclasspath. |
| SU37022.44-1805*16 | I | 04/25/08 | Clients experienced the following issues when creating or maintaining üthe California MIS Student Disabilities (SD) report:ü- There was no way to view or edit the data that was being sent übefore it was exported to the flat file.ü- There was no way to limit the report output by institution for ümulticampus districts.ü- There was no way to force the process to create data records forüthe report or to guarantee report output for a set of people.ü- The report only included enrolled students at the institution, üwhich did not comply with the Chancellor's Office. Any person who üreceived disability services at an institution, enrolled or otherwise,üis eligible to be on the SD report.ü- Disability services staff at an institution were forced to use üthe Emergency Information (EMER) form to view and update disability üinformation for a person, which allowed staff members to view other üpersonal information that they should not have access to.ü- Error and warning messages were not descriptive or helpful for üthe end user running the report.ü- Multicampus districts had difficulty producing the correct üinstitution GI01 Identifiers for each of their campuses.ü- The report did not include any type of printable report for the üend user to review for data integrity checking.ü- Users experienced several different issues relating to records ünot being selected or computed columns failing.üüThe Student Basics (SB) report did not correctly identify all of the üdisabled students based upon the new Student Disabilities (SD) üreporting domain. |
| SU37705.81-1805*07 | I | 04/25/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for Colleague Advancement. See the Description üsection for more information about the issues resolved with this üsoftware update. |
| SU38010.75-1805*05 | I | 04/25/08 | 38541.67üAfter converting records from Benefactor to Colleague, it was found üthat some addresses that had been home and former home addresses in üBenefactor were marked as business and former business addresses in üColleague.üü38544.56üContact information was associated with the wrong individual or üorganization during the conversion. |
| SU38792.37-1805*04 | I | 04/24/08 | Clients reported the following problems with the HR to Benefactor üPayroll Deduction Interface:üüWhen using the Benefactor Deduction Setup (BFDS) form, clients could ünot enter a valid Benefactor Pay Mode on deduction codes. (38696.26)üüWhen entering a Benefactor Pledge ID on the Person's Benefactor Calc üCost (PBCC) form, the PBCC form did not properly validate the pledge üas active or inactive, and did not display all of the information üabout the pledge.ü(38696.26)üüThe Benefactor Payroll Deduction (BFPD) process did not correctly übuild complete pledge payment TX records in the Benefactor database. üThe TX records did not include the donor ID numbers, credit types, andücredit amounts. |
| SU38115.95-485*02 | I | 04/22/08 | When using a WfMS workflow in WebAdvisor, it was possible for üsensitive information to be exposed when people used the Back button.üüTechnical:üThe Allow Workflow to be Reset flag on the Workflow Parameter üDefinition (WFPD) was overriding the setting for Redisplay Behavior onüthe Form Interface parameters (UIP) and Screen Interface Parameters ü(SIP) form. For UI users, the only way to reset a WfMS step is for theüSystem Administrator to reset the step, and only if the Allow Workflowüto be Reset flag is "Yes". WebAdvisor users, however, have the üintrinsic ability to reset a step by using the BACK button. Forms üthat contain sensitive data, like credit card information, should haveütheir data set to expire (Redisplay Behavior is "X"). When this kind üof form is part of a WfMS workflow, however, the Reset flag was üpreventing the data from expiring. |
| SU38068.05-1805*02 | I | 04/18/08 | Menu items specific to Retention Alert were being displayed on client üsystems whether Retention Alert was licensed or not.üüThe Student Search Results web form incorrectly suppressed multiple üacademic programs that were within the same catalog year. |
| SU37356.93-1805*07 | I | 04/17/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with IPEDS reporting. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU37453.52-1805*03 | I | 04/11/08 | Computed columns and IS-type subroutines from file suite files with ümultipart keys that also use non-key data elements from the same file,üand that are used by Datatel-delivered processes, require a special ürelease to resolve the computed column generator issue described in üAnswerNet change request 37694.56. |
| SU38025.93-1805*04 | I | 04/11/08 | After clients used the GL Budget Officer Maintenance (GLOM) form, übudget officers could no longer be found by the Budget Officer üMaintenance (BOFM), Responsibility Worksheet Line (RWLI), or Officer üWorksheet Line Items (OWLI) forms.üüInstitutions that have GL account numbers that are longer than 15 ücharacters in length, and use underscores as delimiters in those GL ünumbers, received incorrect results when using the Verify Pool üPostings Entries (VPPE), AR-CR Posting Analysis (ARPN), and AR-CR üPosting Exceptions (ARPX) processes because GL numbers were not üselected correctly. They also received incorrect results from the üGLA.POOL.ACCOUNT computed column. |
| SU38576.48-485*01 | I | 04/10/08 | Some processes could function incorrectly when doing a "LOCATE ü...BY..." statement against a list that was sorted by using a call to üa UT sort routine. The exact symptoms would depend on how the üprocess was coded to handle a failed LOCATE. |
| SU36545.56-1805*07 | I | 04/09/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üclients for Colleague's data clean up functionality. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU37727.59-1805*05 | I | 04/07/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for converting employment information from üBenefactor into Colleague. See the Description section for more üinformation about the issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU37161.33-1805*02 | I | 04/04/08 | Several conversions with very large numbers of records were üexperiencing slow performance. These include Contributions, üEmployment, and Relationships. Additionally, several defects have übeen reported in various conversions. |
| SU36903.85-1805*09 | I | 04/01/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for Colleague's address functionality. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU30570.52-1805*06 | I | 03/28/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with Colleague Finance. See the üDescription section for an overview of the activities resolved with üthis release. |
| SU36465.26-1805*13 | I | 03/28/08 | Benefactor clients converting into Colleague Advancement needed the üability to convert their planned gifts so that donor giving histories üare complete and so that fundraisers can track planned gifts that haveüyet to be satisfied. |
| SU36517.15-1805*10 | I | 03/28/08 | Some clients have reported performance issues when computing the net üinvoice amount for large numbers of invoices.üüAdditionally, some clients have requested better access to the GL üdistribution of charges incurred by student course sections. |
| SU36531.04-1805*08 | I | 03/28/08 | Some clients have reported performance issues when computing the net üinvoice amount for large numbers of invoices. |
| SU36532.33-1805*04 | I | 03/28/08 | Some clients have reported slow performance when computing the invoiceüamount for large numbers of invoices. |
| SU36812.37-1805*07 | I | 03/28/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with Colleague HR. See the üDescription section for a list of issues resolved in this update. |
| SU36957.37-1805*14 | I | 03/28/08 | T.SQL.SCRIPTS records must be updated to process the 2008/2009 üfinancial aid year. Related computed columns and IS-type subroutines üthat reference file suite files required modification to take üadvantage of the new computed column functionality. |
| SU31163.33-1805*11 | I | 03/27/08 | Numerous issues appeared on Release 18 that provided difficulties for üclients. See the Description section for more information about the üissues resolved with this software update. |
| SU36345.89-485*08 | I | 03/27/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with the software. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU37654.52-485*06 | I | 03/26/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with the software. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU37690.56-1805*03 | I | 03/26/08 | When clients ran the Batch FA Transmittal Register (FATR) process withüthe Print All Students flag set to "No," the resulting report üdisplayed students with reallocations netting to zero, in addition to üstudents with a net increase or decrease in their Financial Aid üamount.üüSome clients have asked for a way to print only those students with a ünet increase or decrease to the amount of a Financial Aid award. |
| SU36646.59-1805*10 | I | 03/24/08 | Some issues were found when implementing ActiveAdmissions for various üclients:ü1. The application import was not always creating an APPLICANTS recordüin Colleague.ü2. An ELF duplicate resolution form was needed for üINTER.OTHER.ADDRESS.ü3. INTER.OTHER.ADDRESS records were being imported before the üINTER.BIODEMO data was imported and before the PERSON was identified.ü4. The first letter of address lines and the city were not properly ücapitalized.ü5. An ELF duplicate resolution form was needed for üINTER.RELATION>PERSON and INTER.RELATION>ADDRESS duplicates.ü6. It was difficult for a user to resolve duplicates using the ELF üTarget Results/Dupl Res (TGTR) form.ü7. Duplicate resolution forms were not accessible from the ELF üTransaction Tracking (ETRK) form.ü8. Clients needed an option to always use the default academic programüspecified on the ActiveAdm Import Parameters (AAIP) form. The system üwas trying determine the academic program based on other incoming üapplication data before using the default from the AAIP form.ü9. The export from Colleague to ActiveAdmissions was timing out due toütoo many records selected.ü10. ActiveAdmissions was not getting data back for prospective üstudents that did not have APPLICATIONS data or address information. |
| SU36756.37-1805*01 | I | 03/24/08 | The Benefactor/Colleague interface programs pass encoded records üthrough the Datatel Messaging Interface (DMI) when transferring data übetween the Colleague and Benefactor environments. A problem was üidentified in the Benefactor account during a Colleague Transfer (CT).ü When the PERSON record in Colleague contained tildes in a user field,üincomplete information was transferred to the Benefactor account. üThis is because the tildes were interpreted as fields marks when the ürecord was decoded, thus losing record integrity. |
| SU36756.37-485*04 | I | 03/24/08 | The Benefactor/Colleague interface programs pass encoded records üthrough the Datatel Messaging Interface (DMI) when transferring data übetween the Colleague and Benefactor environments. A problem was üidentified in the Benefactor account during a Colleague Transfer (CT).ü When the PERSON record in Colleague contained tildes in a user field,üincomplete information was transferred to the Benefactor account. üThis is because the tildes were interpreted as fields marks when the ürecord was decoded, thus losing record integrity. |
| SU38163.67-485*01 | I | 03/17/08 | Garbage Collection execution was failing when a System Login Message üwas defined on the Person Privacy Warnings (PID5) form. |
| SU38088.19-1805*01 | I | 03/14/08 | The Less Than Half Time (LTHT) expenses were not used when calculatingüthe Pell Entitlement amounts.üüClients could not use the Global Option. The RT.FIELD üGLB.MIN.SC.FROM.INC.CALC was missing. |
| SU37379.52-1805*01 | I | 03/10/08 | Clients reported issues with the GL Budget Pool GLS Utility (GLPO). üSee the Description section for more information about the issues üresolved with this software update. |
| SU28971.04-485*07 | I | 03/07/08 | Datatel clients, after they migrated to Colleague Release 18, were üunable to change their database implementation of choice. See the üDescription section for more information about the problems identifiedüand resolved with this software update. |
| SU34200.19-1805*10 | I | 03/07/08 | The Planned Giving and Major Donor optional modules needed to be üincluded in Colleague's reporting solution. Additionally, üopportunities for improving the existing data marts were identified. |
| SU35165.41-1805*07 | I | 03/07/08 | Clients reported a number of issues for the California Employee üDemographics (EB) and Employee Assignments (EJ) reports. Please see üthe Description section for more information about the issues resolvedüwith this software update. |
| SU36359.63-485*07 | I | 03/06/08 | Clients have requested an enhancement to create and maintain their ownüSQL views on the ODS target database using Colleague forms.üüClients also reported a number of problems with the software. See theüDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU36931.07-485*03 | I | 03/06/08 | An updated I_COMMON UT insert was required before a DataOrchestrator üODS software update could be released. |
| SU36544.26-1805*06 | I | 03/05/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities to facilitate reporting üwere discovered by Datatel and clients for Colleague Advancement. See üthe Description section for more information about the issues resolvedüwith this software update. |
| SU37138.48-485*09 | I | 03/05/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with WebAdvisor garbage collectionüprocessing, and a number of enhancement possibilities were identified üby Datatel. See the Description section for more information about üthe changes included in this software update. |
| SU37327.89-485*05 | I | 03/05/08 | 1) IS subroutines that call one of the generic UT sort routines could ünot be generated.ü2) Generic UT sort routines do not always do left-justified ü(alphabetic) sorts correctly. |
| SU36543.75-1805*07 | I | 03/04/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for Colleague Advancement. See the Description üsection for more information about the issues resolved with this üsoftware update. |
| SU36935.85-1805*08 | I | 03/03/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel development and quality assurance teams and beta clients for üRetention Alert. See the Description section for more information üabout the changes included in this software update. |
| SU35165.41-1805*09 | I | 02/25/08 | Clients reported a number of issues for the California Employee üDemographics (EB) and Employee Assignments (EJ) reports. Please see üthe Description section for more information about the issues resolvedüwith this software update. |
| SU37097.07-1805*04 | I | 02/21/08 | The Build Classes Work Files (CLSW) process and the Build Users Work üFile (USRW) processes stopped abruptly when a person was encountered üthat did not have a WebAdvisor login.üüClients would sometimes not know what error occurred during the CLSW üprocess because the message said "X.MSG" instead of describing the üerror. |
| SU37614.04-1805*01 | I | 02/20/08 | Software update 33654.67 contained a new version of the UT routine üS.SUBSORT.ANY.2D.TABLE. The sort specification employed by the üTranscript Results form in WebAdvisor was not compatible with this newüversion, and transcript results were sorted in the reverse of what wasüintended.üAdditionally, each time someone used the Transcript Results form, the üprocess would write a notice about the sort specification to the üUT.THROWN.ERRORS file. |
| SU35522.11-485*04 | I | 02/19/08 | Updates were required for Envision Runtime (UT) to support the üActiveCampus Portal optional module.üüVarious updates to Envision Runtime forms were needed to enhance the üusability of the interface between Colleague and the ActiveCampus üPortal.üCertain fields were too short to properly display long URL paths. üSome group information was not completely removed from the SharePoint ütop site when LDAP groups were removed from the Portal. Students who üwere registered for a course and then added to the Datatel Repository üwere not properly added to the course Team Site. |
| SU35523.52-1805*03 | I | 02/19/08 | Updates were required for Colleague to improve support of the üActiveCampus Portal optional module.üüVarious updates were needed to enhance the usability of the interface übetween Colleague and the ActiveCampus Portal. Cross-listed sections üwere not completely removed when the sections were removed. Students üwho were registered for a course and then added to the Datatel üRepository were not properly added to the course Team Site. When teamüsites are created in a hierarchy, and a component of the hierarchy hasüno value, the resulting site tree can be confusing. |
| SU36462.96-1805*03 | I | 02/19/08 | Several conversions with very large numbers of records are üexperiencing slow performance. These include Contributions, üEmployment, and Relationships. Additionally, several defects have übeen reported in various conversions. |
| SU20183.48-1805*02 | I | 02/15/08 | Clients were not able to execute rules that use computed columns with üfield numbers in the CDD and RT.FIELDS. |
| SU36749.63-485*17 | I | 02/15/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with the Envision Process Handler.üSee the Description section for more information about the issues üresolved with this software update. |
| SU37197.89-1805*02 | I | 02/15/08 | Colleague needed to be updated to meet new regulatory requirements forüIPEDS reporting. Clients were unable to report the number of Degree üSeeking Transfer Students according to new IPEDS requirements. |
| SU37288.22-1805*02 | I | 02/12/08 | Clients reported issues with Student Educational Planning regarding üform alignment and usability. See the description section for more üinformation about the issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU36951.04-1805*02 | I | 02/08/08 | The PLUS and GradPLUS Master Prom Note (MPN) form was changed for the ü2008/2009 year.üüThe 2008/2009 Pell Entitlement figures were changed by the Department üof Education. Datatel Colleague Financial Aid Pell tables needed to übe updated to reflect the new amounts.üüThe parameters for Reject 20 were updated for the 2008/2009 year. üReject 20 has been added for non-filers with income greater than the üminimum IRS filing requirement.üüWhen clients ran the ISIR Import (ISIM) process using the update üaddress option two (Update if CORE is null), a blank address was üsometimes created in Core. |
| SU37320.37-485*03 | I | 02/07/08 | After installing software update 34656.37 (the Delivery of software toüsupport the consolidated R18 full release package), it was found that üthe Deploy SQL View Scripts (DSVS) form would not deploy its views üwhen using the Specific View IDs selection method. |
| SU36773.63-1805*07 | I | 02/06/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel development and quality assurance teams and beta clients for üRetention Alert. See the Description section for more information üabout the changes included in this software update. |
| CFR36020.63-1805*10 | D | 02/05/08 | The only full release provided by Datatel was released in January of ü2006, which meant that clients needed to install that full release üalong with all software updates released thereafter in order to bring üan R18 environment current on all released Datatel software. |
| SU34656.37-485*08 | I | 02/05/08 | The only provided full release package for Release 18.0 was built and üreleased in January of 2006. As a result, populating a new R18 üenvironment required the client to install that full release and all üsubsequent software updates to bring an environment to current. In üaddition, several other issues affected the release system that would üimpact installation of a Release 18 environment. See the Description üsection for more information about the problems identified and üresolved with this software update. |
| SU35225.07-485*03 | I | 02/05/08 | LPRs built prior to January 2006 are unable to easily populate new üRelease 18.0 environments for testing or training purposes or to take üadvantage of the consolidated release software. |
| SU35324.19-4.1.0*325 | I | 02/05/08 | Consolidated Full Release packages could not be downloaded into the üLocal Product Repository. |
| SU33524.74-4.1.0*342 | I | 01/31/08 | Clients have reported a number of issues with Datatel software, and a ünumber of issues and enhancements were identified in-house. See the üDescription section for more information about the items included in üthis software update. |
| SU35268.22-485*02 | I | 01/31/08 | The Multiple File Indexing (UTBA) process has had recent changes to üallow it to run for files that are marked as application server files,üeven for Oracle and SQL Server clients. Examples of some files that üthe UTBA process was fixed to work with are the UT.THROWN.ERRORS, üWWW.STATE.ARGS, and WWW.EVENT.SEQUENCE files. Now that the UTBA üprocess can process these files, it was found that if the UTBA processüwas run from anything other than UT, these files would still not be üprocessed, with an error message appearing in the final log indicatingüthat strategy information could not be created. |
| SU35325.63-1805*06 | I | 01/30/08 | Clients running the SEVIS Continuance Verify (SEVC) process received üError S1117 from the Department of Homeland Security for students üwhose anticipated program end date was between the current term's end üdate and the next term's start date. The error states:üü"Next session start date must be on or before the program end date." |
| SU35325.63-4.1.0*341 | I | 01/30/08 | Clients running the SEVIS Continuance Verify (SEVC) process received üError S1117 from the Department of Homeland Security for students üwhose anticipated program end date was between the current term's end üdate and the next term's start date. The error states:üü"Next session start date must be on or before the program end date." |
| SU36542.37-1805*05 | I | 01/30/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for Colleague Advancement. See the Description üsection for more information about the issues resolved with this üsoftware update. |
| SU35126.81-1805*03 | I | 01/29/08 | Clients reported several issues and enhancement requests for the TexasüSuccess Initiative (TSI) CBM002 Report programs in the Texas State üReporting - Student (TXST) optional module. See the Description üsection for a list of the change requests addressed in this update. |
| SU35872.48-1805*06 | I | 01/25/08 | Changes to the Colleague environment in R18 affected the use of ücomputed columns in the Financial Aid module. |
| SU36664.74-1805*01 | I | 01/25/08 | Software Update 29792.63 released a change to the S.REG.STU.COURSE üsubroutine that could cause schedule conflict errors to be mistakenly üreported when registering students. In some instances, the process ücould report a conflict between a student's section registration and üan unrelated campus event. |
| SU36890.15-1805*02 | I | 01/22/08 | Clients wanted to be able to query off of the OTHER.DATES file, and toüinclude the person's name in their queries |
| SU37043.18-485*01 | I | 01/22/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with the software. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU36949.22-1805*01 | I | 01/21/08 | A user's address and phone number data could become corrupted after üediting the address on the WebAdvisor Address Change form. Either a üblank address value could be added to the user's list, an existing üaddress could be inadvertently removed, or personal phone numbers ücould be lost. |
| SU36284.48-485*05 | I | 01/18/08 | Clients reported a number of issues with the Metadata Transfer Processü(METP). See the Description section for more information about the üissues resolved with this software update. |
| SU32740.78-1805*04 | I | 01/17/08 | The intermediate files built by the Build Class Workfiles (CLSW) üprocess for export to CampusCruiser had a number of improvements that üneeded to be made. They included:üü20944.96 - The list of course prerequisites was replaced by an error ümessage if it exceeded 128 characters.ü11756.48 - The location of a class and the time it met was incorrectlyüassociated.ü7935.85 - The course list on CampusCruiser listed a separate course üfor each section.ü27312.04 & 25469.56 -The Campus Cruiser File Transfer (CCFT) process üfailed, thus the files were never sent.üüIn addition, the DMI Admin ID and Password required by many of the üCampus Cruiser screens is no longer needed. |
| SU37016.96-1805*01 | I | 01/17/08 | Clients who use Nebraska Books had problems processing refunds in üFA~Link.üNebraska was sending the FA~Link Host server a non-standard refund üpacket. |
| SU36893.74-4.1.0*337 | I | 01/15/08 | 36492.44 - For UniData clients, if the RETURN keyword signifying the üend of an IS subroutine was not on the last line of the body of the üsubroutine code (either due to there being more internal subroutines üor a comment existing after the RETURN statement), then code that willücorrupt active select list zero will be generated into the UniBasic üsource code used by Computed Columns. This issue may present itself üto an end user by only processing one record through QueryBuilder or üon an Envision report.üü36362.63 - When generating some web forms, the following warning was üissued:üGenerating Web form...üWeb form generation successful, compiling resultsüüCompiling Unibasic: CORE.WBS/S_WBCOS039_WEB in mode 'u'.üWarning: Variable 'XSAVE' never assigned a value compilation finishedüCatalogued DIRECTlyüUpdating GEN.TDOCü================================================================Code üGeneration completed: |
| SU37009.04-1805*02 | I | 01/15/08 | Datatel delivered the S.GET.ACTIVE.PROGRAMS subroutine on software üupdate SU33654.67-1805*05. When it was delivered on üSU33654.67-1805*05, it was susceptible to the issue describe in changeürequest 36492.44 (IS subroutines can destroy active list 0). |
| SU36431.78-1805*05 | I | 01/11/08 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for Colleague Advancement. See the Description üsection for more information about the issues resolved with this üsoftware update. |
| SU36356.41-1805*02 | I | 01/10/08 | Clients could not perform an AP Type LookUp when accessing a record onüthe Bookstore AR Account Limits (BKAC) form.üüWhen clients added a new AR Code on the Bookstore Charge Parameters ü(BKCP) form, they could not assign a priority at the same time. |
| SU36488.52-1805*03 | I | 01/10/08 | The following issues with the online help for Colleague HR were üreported in AnswerNet:üü- 34999.74 contains miscellaneous help issues related to typos, ümissing help for display-only fields, and tables that were no longer üformatted correctly. These issues were reported for the following üforms:ü -- Significant Employment Dates (DATE)ü -- Employment Summary (EMPS)ü -- HR Labels (HRLB)ü -- Person's Amount Calc Cost (PACC)ü -- TimeVision Data Export (TVEX)ü -- Person's Wages Summary (WAGS)üü- 35436.74 pertains to removing the references to pay-period time ütracking from online help. As of August 31, 2007, Datatel stopped üsupporting this time-tracking method.üü- 35492.41 pertains to an incorrect reference to a leave accrual ümethod in the process help for the Personnel Leave Accrual (PLVA) üform. The help should refer to the "Personnel accrual method," not üthe "Human Resources accrual method."üü- 35525.93 pertains to removing references to employee-level setup üfrom online help. Although Datatel stopped supporting employee-level üsetup several years ago, information about it remained in the online ühelp.üü- 36576.75 pertains to two issues with field help on the Change üPrimary Position Info (CPPI) form. It also presented three issues üthat were not addressed in this release; these pertain to how field ülabels on the CPPI form are displayed in the help system. |
| SU35679.11-1805*05 | I | 01/08/08 | When clients created a new GL account in fiscal year 2008 and gave itüfiscal year 2008 activity, and then pooled it to an existing budget üpool on the Update GL Pool Level Linkages (GLPL) form, the poolee üactuals were linked incorrectly to the umbrella for fiscal year 2007. üThis occurred if both fiscal years were open. If clients unpooled the übudget pool, the incorrect linkage was not removed. Then, when the übudget pool was re-pooled, the problem was compounded. |
| SU15746.04-1805*09 | I | 01/03/08 | Clients need additional date fields that are defined and maintained byüeach institution. |
| SU35419.25-1805*05 | I | 12/21/07 | - The Override VOC for Source Files (ACS2) process did not maintain üfailed VOC path, making it difficult to correct any errors which ücaused the path to fail. After manually entering a correct path, the üUpdate VOC for Source Files (ACS1) process had to be rerun to confirm üthe correct path was valid.üü-The Demographic conversions did not allow PERSON records to be ügrouped by type to allow for different merge criteria during the üconversion run. This required that all PERSON records be converted üwith one set of merge criteria. üü-The Demographic conversions did not maintain the origin date on the üPerson or Corp record and incorrectly replaced it with the date the üconversions were run.üü-The conversions did not maintain the dash between the zip code and üits four digit extension.üü-The P6 MATCH.DETAIL conversion returned a Hush Off error and closed üthe session when run in validation mode.üü-The Build BENCA.ACADEMIC (ACU4) process did not clear the translate ütable when re-run.üü-When converting addresses, the address's County code was not appendedüto the address when the zip was 9 digits long. |
| SU36241.11-1805*03 | I | 12/21/07 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel for Colleague Advancement's web functionality. |
| SU36742.89-1805*03 | I | 12/21/07 | Instructions received from the IRS state that increases to charges forüa prior year are to be reported in box 2 and decreases to charges for üa prior year are to be reported in box 4. Likewise, increases to üscholarships or grants for a prior year should be reported in box 5 üand decreases should be reported in box 6.üüRegistration billing and financial aid transmittal can occur several ütimes resulting in multiple transactions that offset each other. üReporting all increases in one box and all decreases in another üresulted in a large amounts being reported for boxes 2, 4, 5, and 6 onüthe 1098-T Tuition Statement forms for some students with a lot of üactivity. |
| SU36770.04-1805*02 | I | 12/21/07 | In some cases the 1099-MISC Form Print (MFRM) process was not printingüthe Payer's federal identification number. |
| SU36663.22-1805*01 | I | 12/19/07 | Clients discovered that while awarding Pell awards, the TA.LOCATION üfield was not being populated with a location. This would only occur üif the first award given was Pell. Re-packaging or re-awarding the üstudent would result in the TA.LOCATION being set properly. Further üresearch indicated that ACG, SMART, and awards that used custom üaward-split subroutines could also be affected.üüDirect Lending (DL) clients noticed that when transmitting DL awards, üthe fees were being counted as pending FA instead of being counted as üfees.üWhen transmitting for an award period containing multiple üdisbursements, the correct amount was being transmitted, however, the üamount was not being allocated correctly across the disbursements. üThis situation could cause rejects by COD. |
| SU24178.74-1805*46 | I | 12/18/07 | Clients needed a way to alert the appropriate persons when a student übecomes a retention risk, and then keep track of what is being done orüneeds to be done in order to retain as many of these students as üpossible. |
| SU29655.78-485*18 | I | 12/18/07 | 1) WfMS workflows would automatically cancel the activity and the üwhole workflow if the user canceled from the primary activity of the üworkflow.üThis was desirable in situations where the workflow was initiated by üthat user. However, workflows that were created and assigned by üanother process would just disappear (be deleted from the database) ifüthe assigned user canceled from the primary activity of the workflow.üü2) Because of the potentially large numbers of items that may be üplaced on a To Do List, the WebAdvisor My To Do List form and the My üTo Do List (MTDL) form in Colleague needed to summarize worklist üitems that are alike (worklist items that are for the same workflow üactivity ID and category). Also, additional data was needed on the ToüDo Lists, and some column headers were unclear to new users.üü3) WebAdvisor's My To Do List contained an OK button. Clicking that ücould unexpectedly delete a WORKFLOW and WORKLIST records.üü4) This software update also addresses the following AnswerNet Change üRequests:üü34074.75: BACKing out of a WfMS web workflow Using the BACK button allüthe way out of a WfMS web workflow did not properly exit the worklist üitem, including the cases when a worklist item was hyperlinked from a ümenu or from the My To Do List form in WebAdvisor.üThere were two slightly different scenarios:ü - If a WfMS web workflow was started from the menu, and the user üproceeded past the primary activity in the workflow and then backed üall the way out to the menu again, a worklist item was incorrectly üleft on this user's To Do List and remained there until completed or ümanually terminated.ü - If a WfMS web workflow was started from the My To Do List form in üWebAdvisor and the user backed into My To Do List, the worklist item üwas incorrectly left in an open state until the session ended and ügarbage collection ran.üü17037.26: WfMS: Using WMTD and MTDL together causes Web Activity to ürepeatüA scenario involving both web and UI activities in a WfMS workflow üresulted in unexpectedly repeating a web activity when the user üclicked the OK button on the WMTD form. |
| SU28842.81-1805*06 | I | 12/17/07 | Regulatory updates were needed in Colleague to be able to process ISIRüinformation for 2008/2009. Also, clients reported a number of issues üwith the software. See the Description section for more information üabout the issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU33654.67-1805*05 | I | 12/17/07 | Numerous issues appeared on Release 18 that provided difficulties for üclients who were migrating from Release 17. See the Description üsection for more information about the issues resolved with this üsoftware update. |
| SU36340.89-485*05 | I | 12/17/07 | Clients reported a number of issues with the software. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU35868.22-1805*04 | I | 12/14/07 | Several issues and enhancement opportunities were discovered by üDatatel and clients for Colleague Advancement. See the Description üsection for more information about the issues resolved with this üsoftware update. |
| SU36600.22-1805*01 | I | 12/13/07 | The Batch Award (BAWD) process was not awarding all students from üeither a saved list or individual student IDs entered on the form. üWhen one student got an error the rest of the students processed afterüthat received the same error, whether it was valid for them or not. |
| SU18796.52-4.1.0*334 | I | 12/12/07 | New regulatory changes needed to be implemented in the software so üthat clients could accurately process T4A year-end regulatory forms üand media for 2007. Additionally, for 2007, the CRA shifted the T4A üslip down by one line requiring a corresponding change to the üstylesheet. |
| SU34051.78-1805*04 | I | 12/12/07 | Colleague needed to be updated to meet the new Canada Revenue Agency ü(CRA) regulatory changes for T4A slips.üüClients reported a number of issues with the forms used to process üT4As.üSee the Description section for more information about the issues üresolved with this software update. |
| SU34339.41-1805*03 | I | 12/12/07 | Clients requested a number of enhancements for Colleague T2202A üReporting, and reported some issues with the software. See the üDescription section for a list of change requests resolved with this ürelease. |
| SU34554.04-1805*06 | I | 12/12/07 | Clients reported a number of issues with Datatel Colleague Finance. üSee the Description section for an overview of the activities resolvedüwith this release. |
| SU34746.11-1805*12 | I | 12/12/07 | Regulatory changes required that Colleague be updated in order to üproduce compliant 1098 and 1099 forms. Also, clients reported some üissues with the software. See the Description section for more üinformation about the issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU36525.78-1805*01 | I | 12/12/07 | A future enhancement to Benefit/Deduction processing requires the üaddition of a new field to the BENDED file. This software update must übe delivered separately to avoid conflicts with future software üupdates. |
| SU34787.89-1805*01 | I | 12/07/07 | The Social Security Administration updated its requirements for W-2 üforms.üüThe Social Security Administration has added a new field to the üsubmitter (Code RA) record on the W-2 and state/local tax agency üexport files to hold the Software Vendor Code. The Datatel Software üVendor Code is 1381 and should be included in the submitter record.üüThe Civil Status field has been removed from the optional employee üwage (Code RO) record on the W-2 export file. The Civil Status field üwas reported for Puerto Rican citizens only.üüA new optional state total (Code RV) record has been added. This ürecord should be included on all state/local export files.üüClients reported a number of issues with the software and üdocumentation.üSee the Description section for more information about the issues üresolved with this software update. |
| SU36418.56-1805*01 | I | 12/05/07 | Clients encountered errors when converting to Colleague Advancement.üü-24148.04üThe field IACAD.DEGREE.DATE in INTER.CREDENTIAL was too short and üprevented older dates from converting properly.ü ü-The P6 MATCH.DETAIL conversion returned a Hush Off error and closed üthe session when run in validation mode. |
| SU35904.63-1805*02 | I | 12/04/07 | In some cases, the List GL Activity (LGLA) report was sorted üincorrectly when the user included more than one GL number.üüTechnical:üThe LGLA process was changed on activity 30349.96 to no longer use theüGLA.WORK file for record selection, and to select records directly üfrom the appropriate GL activity file. For some clients, the new ürecord selection in the LGLA process did not select the necessary ürecords in the correct order. |
| SU36320.04-485*01 | I | 12/04/07 | The list of records returned by the LookUp processor or batch üprocesses could be incorrect when the lists of keys being processed ücontained numeric keys of varying lengths. |
| SU34394.11-1805*05 | I | 11/30/07 | Clients reported a number of issues with computed columns not üevaluating correctly at runtime. See the Description section for more üinformation about the issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU34166.11-1805*05 | I | 11/29/07 | Clients could not accept donations or view constituent profile üinformation through WebAdvisor. |
| SU27497.74-1805*14 | I | 11/21/07 | Colleague did not have an integrated bookstore point-of-sale system üthat allowed students to make purchases at the campus bookstore using üfinancial aid and sponsorship funds. |
| SU31511.85-1805*09 | I | 11/21/07 | The previous version of the Datatel Colleague Interface to FA~Link by üTrimdata lacked some tools that would be helpful for clients. |
| SU34717.48-1805*02 | I | 11/21/07 | Because of changes to the financial aid and sponsor billing software üin Colleague (released with software update 29821.07), the Datatel üColleague Interface to FA~Link by Trimdata needed to be updated to ükeep it working properly. |
| SU35202.63-1805*01 | I | 11/21/07 | The previous Unidata subroutine calls were not in compliance with OPENüSSL encryption routines. Trimdata was using a command line interface üfor encryption because of this. Now that Unidata's latest 7.1.6 ürelease has fixed their encryption routines, Trimdata can use a üsubroutine call instead of the command line interface to do üencryption. |
| SU35698.89-1805*04 | I | 11/21/07 | SQL Server clients encountered record locks between FA~Link inquiry üand POST calls. |
| SU35963.96-1805*01 | I | 11/21/07 | In the Student Database Export (BKEX) process, the selection process üdid not work properly. Additionally, some processes (FLNK014B, üS.FLNK.FORMAT_NEBK and S.FLNK.FORMAT_STUEX) occasionally would write üout records with incomplete data. This problem normally affected onlyütest databases. |
| SU36005.96-1805*01 | I | 11/21/07 | The Datatel Colleague Interface to FA~Link by Trimdata needed some üupdates to work the same in R18 as it did in R17.üTechnical: The list specification for the Sponsor Billing Export ü(BKSE) process was missing some selection criteria that was on R17. üAlso, the new Envision generator required a change to one of the file üreads used by the FLNKB012 and FLNKB013 processes |
| SU35247.63-485*04 | I | 11/19/07 | Clients reported a number of issues with the software. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU36113.93-1805*01 | I | 11/16/07 | Clients reported a number of issues for the Colleague Student üCalifornia MIS reports. Please see the Description section for more üinformation about the issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU33501.81-1805*03 | I | 11/15/07 | Clients received the following errors when using some forms in üColleague Student:üü"Please delete the blank row(s) from the "Status Info" group." orü"Please delete the blank row(s) from the "Status" group" |
| SU35476.41-4.1.0*330 | I | 11/13/07 | There was not a way to specify which file suite year to read in an IS üsubroutine because COMMON is not available. There was no way to üdetermine what file suite year a computed column was being executed üagainst. There was not a way to selectively read certain records fromüa file within an IS subroutine. |
| SU35476.41-485*06 | I | 11/13/07 | There was not a way to specify which file suite year to read in an IS üsubroutine because COMMON is not available. There was no way to üdetermine what file suite year a computed column was being executed üagainst. There was not a way to selectively read certain records fromüa file within an IS subroutine. |
| SU35885.26-485*03 | I | 11/13/07 | MIOSEL would only return the last key of its result set (in a UniData üenvironment) if it used a computed column that performed a nested üMIOSEL statement. Nested UniQuery statements selecting to the same üactive list would clear the result set before each execution, causing üthe outer MIOSEL to lose all its active IDs prior to the last record üselected for evaluation. |
| SU36082.19-485*01 | I | 11/13/07 | R18 clients could not use stylesheet printing. The extensions used byüDMI for stylesheet printing did not have the correct role assigned. |
| SU35865.26-485*04 | I | 11/11/07 | Software update SU23856.67-485 changed the way that updated computed ücolumns are deployed to the database. Online help did not adequately üdescribe the process, specifically what it means when a software üupdate group has a status of "Deploying." |
| SU35125.22-1805*03 | I | 11/09/07 | Clients reported several issues and enhancement requests for the üStudent (CBM001) Report programs in the Texas State Reporting - üStudent (TXST) optional module. See the Description section for a ülist of the change requests addressed in this update. |
| SU35503.33-1805*02 | I | 11/09/07 | 29386.11 and 35107.63üThe Advancement GL Post Register (AGLR) report did not allow clients aüchoice of posting descriptions displayed and subsequently transmitted üto the General Ledger. Contributions were only submitted to the GL üwith the Designation name as a description. As a result, the GL ütransaction description was a repetition of the GL account and was notüsufficiently descriptive. |
| SU28833.41-1805*02 | I | 11/06/07 | Regulatory updates were needed in Colleague to be able to process üPROFILE application information for 2008/2009. |
| SU32434.48-1805*02 | I | 11/06/07 | Colleague required regulatory enhancements in order for clients to üprocess INAS PROFILE applications for 2008/2009. |
| SU32437.89-485*01 | I | 11/06/07 | Regulatory updates were needed in Colleague to be able to process üPROFILE application information for 2008/2009. Envision Runtime (UT) ürequired a new DMI Extension record. |
| SU28738.93-485*03 | I | 11/05/07 | The Create Optional Module Group (COMG) process had some defects and üusability issues that made it more difficult than necessary to installüoptional module components into Colleague environments. See the üDescription section for more information about the problems identifiedüand resolved with this software update. |
| SU35875.96-1805*01 | I | 11/02/07 | Some Independent students with dependents other than a spouse (EFC üFormula Type 3) were calculated as an Auto Zero EFC (AZE) in error forü2007/2008 Need Analysis Calculations. |
| SU35931.56-1805*01 | I | 11/02/07 | A problem was introduced on the 2008/2009 FAFSA software release that üremoves a student's verification status and date when the student ürecord is accessed using the Need Analysis Summary (NASU) form and üwhen the student has more than one transaction listed on the form. |
| SU30782.63-485*08 | I | 11/01/07 | Updates were required for Envision Runtime (UT) to support the üColleague Interface to the ActiveCampus Portal optional module.üWhen the Colleague Interface to the ActiveCampus portal ran backgroundüWorkflow Management Systems (WfMS) processes, they would log warning üand error message into a new table. Each time the processes was run, üthey would log the duplicate messages. This caused the WORKLIST.MSGS ütable to get very large, and affected performance.üWhen the Colleague Interface to the ActiveCampus portal created üaggregation portal sites that were included in a URL path to a team üsite, the navigation bar parameters were incorrectly set to the same üvalues as constituency home sites whereas they should have been set toüthe same parameter values for team sites. The navigation parameters ütell the ActiveCampus portal whether or not to show the site on the ünavigation bar and whether or not to show the navigation bar on the üportal site.üThe validation code value sent in the original delivery of the üUT.VALCODE table PORTAL.PERMISSIONS for "V View Only" is no longer a üvalid value and needed to be removed from the table.üWhen a client needed to manually terminate an ActiveCampus Interface üWfMS worklist item (or the entire workflow), they were required to üdetail several forms down just to get the key to the WfMS workflow andüworklist items to be managed. |
| SU32149.56-485*06 | I | 10/30/07 | Clients reported a number of issues in Envision Runtime (UT) and üEnvision Tool Kit (TOOL). See the Description section for more üinformation about the issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU32425.11-1805*07 | I | 10/30/07 | Clients reported a number of issues with Colleague Finance. See the üDescription section for an overview of the activities resolved with üthis release, and see "Release Highlights: CF Fall Bundle 2007," üavailable for download from Datatel's website ü(www.datatel.com/documentation), for more detailed information. |
| SU32553.96-1805*06 | I | 10/30/07 | Clients reported a number of issues in Colleague HR. Please see the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU32712.07-1805*05 | I | 10/30/07 | Clients requested a number of enhancements for Colleague Accounts üReceivable, and reported some issues with the software. See the üDescription section for a list of change requests resolved with this ürelease. |
| SU33022.48-1805*05 | I | 10/30/07 | Clients reported a number of issues with Colleague Advancement. See üthe Description section for more information about the issues resolvedüwith this software update. |
| SU34195.67-1805*01 | I | 10/30/07 | Software update 33022.48 introduced an issue with the Contribution üAdjustment (CADJ) form that restricted contributions to only those üwith a CONTRIB.SESSION.STATUS of Posted or Reconciled. This preventedüclients from adjusting contributions that were recorded in Colleague üAdvancement through the conversion programs, because converted ücontributions have no CONTRIB.SESSION.STATUS. |
| SU34791.85-1805*04 | I | 10/26/07 | There were two problems. First, a phone number added on the EmploymentüDetail (EMPD) form would not be saved in the database. This occurred üwhen the address on the EMPD form had been modified from the original üaddress of the employer. üSecond, if a future Start Date were specified for an employment recordüon the EMPD form, the address assigned to the employment would be üassigned a "current" status, instead of the "pending" status it shouldüreceive.üThese two problems also occurred on the Organization Contact Details ü(ORCD) form. |
| SU35595.22-4.1.0*319 | I | 10/23/07 | Due to a regulatory change by the Department of Education, clients üneeded the ability to request the deletion of the LowTuitionFeesCode üelement contained in the CommonRecord XML document that is submitted üto COD to report Pell award information. The stylesheet used to build üthe Pell award section of the CommonRecord did not allow the delete üfunctionality for this element. |
| SU25742.15-1805*09 | I | 10/22/07 | The My Week web part in the ActiveCampus Portal needed a new web form üto collate a user's personal calendar in Colleague and return the üfollowing types of events for the appropriate time frame:ü ü - Course sections in which the user is enrolled or that the user is üteaching.ü - Any other scheduled entries (CALENDAR.SCHEDULES records) where thisüperson is a participant.ü - Appointment reminders in which this person participates, from the üMiscellaneous Scheduling (MSCH) and Appointment Reminders (APPT) üforms.üWebAdvisor supports the display of MISC.TEXT records containing HTML ümarkup.üWhen this markup contains links back to WebAdvisor or images hosted byüthe servlet, the portal did not interpret the links correctly. |
| SU27730.07-485*61 | I | 10/22/07 | Updates were required for Envision Runtime (UT) to support the üActiveCampus Portal optional module.üNew forms and processes needed to be added to the UT application in üthe Resource Definition menu, and some existing forms and processes ürequired modifications. These forms and processes are the basis for üthe portal application software. |
| SU27731.59-1805*34 | I | 10/22/07 | Updates were required for Colleague applications (CORE/HR/ST) to üsupport the ActiveCampus Portal optional module.üNew forms and processes needed to be added to the CORE/HR/ST üapplications in various menus, and some existing forms and processes ürequired modifications.üThese forms and processes are the basis for the portal application üsoftware in Colleague. |
| SU28375.22-4.1.0*315 | I | 10/22/07 | A new DMI extension and a set of EDX XSL stylesheets were needed to üenable Colleague forms and processes to manage the ActiveCampus üPortal. |
| SU30428.37-485*30 | I | 10/22/07 | Updates were required for Envision Runtime (UT) to support the üActiveCampus Portal optional module.üNew forms and processes needed to be added to the UT application in üvarious menus, and some existing forms and processes required ümodifications. These forms and processes are the basis for the portalüapplication software in Colleague. |
| SU30937.93-485*28 | I | 10/22/07 | Updates were required for Envision Runtime (UT) to support the üActiveCampus Portal optional module.üNew forms and processes needed to be added to the UT application in üvarious menus, and some existing forms and processes required ümodifications. These forms and processes are the basis for the portalüapplication software in Colleague. |
| SU30938.37-1805*26 | I | 10/22/07 | Updates were required for Colleague applications (CORE/HR/ST) to üsupport the ActiveCampus Portal optional module.üNew forms and processes needed to be added to the CORE/HR/ST üapplications in various menus, and some existing forms and processes ürequired modifications.üThese forms and processes are the basis for the portal application üsoftware in Colleague. |
| SU31464.33-1805*06 | I | 10/22/07 | ActiveCampus Portal Webparts require associated form help to provide üinformation to users and administrators about the capabilities and ücustomizations available to each web part in Active Campus Portal üsites. |
| SU34276.19-485*02 | I | 10/22/07 | Clients reported a number of issues with the software. See the üDescription section for more information about the issues resolved üwith this software update. |
| SU35582.26-4.1.0*318 | I | 10/22/07 | Enhancements were needed in the DAS to support the DataOrchestrator üproject.üClients also reported a number of issues with Datatel software, and a ünumber of issues and enhancements were identified in-house. See the üDescription section for more information about the items included in üthis software update. |
| SU35200.78-1805*02 | I | 10/18/07 | In R18, the WebAdvisor form Test Summary (WTSU - WBSTS14) was no ülonger displaying the Admissions Tests. Rather, depending on the übrowser, the form displayed either a black line running across the üpage or an empty table. |
| SU28724.33-4.1.0*308 | I | 10/17/07 | Enhancements were needed in the DAS to support the DataOrchestrator üproject.üClients also reported a number of issues with Datatel software, and a ünumber of issues and enhancements were identified in-house. See the üDetail section for more information about the items included in this üsoftware update. |
| SU28830.41-1805*04 | I | 10/17/07 | Regulatory updates were needed in Colleague to be able to process üFAFSA information for 2008/2009. This software update also addresses aünumber of bug fixes and enhancement requests as listed in the üDescription section. |
| SU34424.52-4.1.0*313 | I | 10/15/07 | Clients reported a number of problems that were related to the way DMIüoperated. See the Description section for more information about the üissues resolved with this software update. |
| SU35412.93-1805*03 | I | 10/15/07 | The Build Student CalWORKs Data (CACW) form did not produce a summary üreport when using the "Both" report option in non-update mode.üThe CACW process removed the leading zero of TOPs Codes for CalWORKs üPositions.üThe Student CalWORKs SC Export (CSCE) and Student CalWORKs CW Export ü(CCWE) processes were not correctly producing output files. |
| SU35413.85-1805*02 | I | 10/12/07 | Clients were trying to award SMART Grants for students they believed üwere eligible for the award based upon updated documentation from the üDepartment of Education. Colleague would reject the award, stating üthat the student's academic program was not eligible for the award. |
| SU30480.85-1805*03 | I | 10/10/07 | In addition to regulatory changes, clients requested a number of üenhancements to the Texas State Reporting Financial Aid Database üreport programs. See the Description section for a list of the changeürequests addressed in this update. |
| D01_TRAINING_DATA*010 | D | 10/08/07 | |
| SU30349.96-1805*03 | I | 10/08/07 | Clients using Colleague Finance sometimes encountered various error ümessages or other issues. This software update resolves the issues ülisted in the Description section. |
| SU34741.04-1805*03 | I | 10/08/07 | 29393.63üThe Advancement GL Post Register (AGLR) did not display the correct üpage numbers.ü34298.37üContribution adjustments produced incorrect GL entries on the üAdvancement GL Post Register (AGLR). When a payment method override üwas entered on the designation, the contribution used that designationüand pay method, the contribution had more than one donor/designation üin the donor fields, and the last donor did not contain the entire ühard credit amount. In that case, the proper GL entries were not üposted to GL. To correct this situation, a manual journal entry had toübe created.ü34824.78üThe donor credit allocation recorded on a pledge was not preserved üfrom the originating pledge when staff recorded a payment on the üPledge Payment Entry (PPE) form.ü34879.04üThe Advancement GL Post Register (AGLR) displayed contributions in theüorder they were stored in the contribution session. If you accessed üthe contributions prior to reconciliation on the Session Contribution üSummary (SCSM) form, the order in which the contributions were stored üwas changed from contribution ID to alphabetically by donor name. |
| SU34822.78-1805*01 | I | 10/08/07 | On Release 18.0: The adjustment forms that are available for the Pay üPeriod Gross Summary (PPGS) form (PPAA, PPBA, PPDA, PPLA, PPTA) did ünot allow adjustments to be made to the last paycheck of employees üwhose employment was being terminated during the pay period being üprocessed. |
| SU35238.15-1805*01 | I | 10/04/07 | After loading software update 28276.59 for Colleague Core, migrating üR17 to R18 clients using LDAP synchronization got the following error üwhen attempting to update an existing user on the DMI Registry User üSetup (DRUS) form:üü"User already exists in the directory server" |
| SU34196.25-1805*07 | D | 10/03/07 | After loading software update 28276.59 for Colleague Core, migrating üR17 to R18 clients using LDAP synchronization got the following error üwhen attempting to update an existing user on the DMI Registry User üSetup (DRUS) form:ü"User already exists in the directory server" |
| SU33737.59-1805*03 | I | 10/01/07 | Clients reported a number of issues with Colleague Advancement. See üthe Description section for more information about the issues resolvedüwith this software update. |
| SU34402.52-1805*04 | I | 10/01/07 | Clients reported a number of issues for the Student Financial Aid ü(SF/FA) report. Please see the Description section for more üinformation about the issues resolved with this software update. |
| SU28266.37-1805*18 | I< |